← Strategemata

Premium withoutProfit

THE PREMIUM MEASURES THE MARKET,
NOT THE BUYER

Francis Ruan

A hundred and seventy percent premium ends most arguments before they start. Half the coverage read it as Mars losing its mind and half as a triumph for shareholders, and both are lazy in the same way. A premium is not a measurement of the buyer. It is the distance between a price and a value, and when that distance gets this large the interesting party is usually the one who was wrong beforehand.

Start with the number you cannot use

Mars offered five hundred and thirty four million pounds in November 2023, three hundred and seventy five pence a share in cash, completing that January. In the financial year to July 2023 Hotel Chocolat had gone from a pre tax profit of twenty one point seven million pounds to a loss of eight hundred thousand.

So earnings cannot value this, because at the moment of the offer there effectively were not any. That is the whole puzzle rather than a footnote. Any read starting from the premium is measuring out from a price the public market had already given up on, which makes the premium a statement about the starting point and not about Mars.

What the market could not price

Look at what does exist. Hotel Chocolat was founded in 2004, sells through its own stores and its own website, and owns a hundred and forty acre cocoa estate and the Rabot Hotel in Saint Lucia. That is a business controlling its product from the tree to the till.

Public markets are good at pricing earnings and poor at pricing structure, and vertical integration is almost pure structure. It shows up as cost while it is being built and as resilience only much later, so a loss making year makes it look like an expensive habit rather than an asset. Mars could price it because Mars knows exactly what it does not have: it is exceptional at moving volume through other people's shelves and has no premium brand with its own estate, its own retail and a direct line to the person eating the thing. You cannot assemble that in pieces. You buy somebody who already spent twenty years on it.

The argument against my own thesis

If the structure is the asset, then the risk is that owning it changes it. The quality making Hotel Chocolat worth a premium is that it is small enough to control end to end, and every move to scale it, more stores, more countries, more volume through a finite estate, works against the thing that justified the price.

My concern is not deliberate damage. It is that the instinct which makes Mars excellent is precisely the instinct that dissolves a vertically integrated premium business, and I have no evidence either way yet.

My call

Defensible, and more interesting than the premium makes it sound. The metric is not sales growth, it is the share of sales still moving through Hotel Chocolat's own channels. If that falls while total sales climb, Mars bought the structure and then spent it.

Public markets price earnings well and structure badly, and this company was almost entirely structure.

The Trojan Horse engraving

Sources

  1. Mars offer announced 16 November 2023 at 375p per share; transaction completed 25 January 2024.
  2. Hotel Chocolat financial year to July 2023, pre tax result moving from a 21.7m profit to a 0.8m loss, per contemporaneous coverage of the company's results.